Forum: It’s Discrimination Against Women …

Editor’s note: This Reader Forum article was written by Jane Partridge, co-president of the Lake Forest-Lake Bluff League of Women Voters. It represents the writer’s opinions and not necessarily those of GazeboNews. We encourage you to respond to this, but please include your full name per the GazeboNews comments policy on Reader Forums.

By Jane Partridge, co-president of the League of Women Voters – Lake Forest/Lake Bluff Area

The League of Women Voters was born more than 90 years ago from the long fight to get women the right to vote. Since 1992, when League members studied health care policy, we have worked to ensure access to quality health care for all. The League also has a strong commitment and belief that public policy in a diverse society must affirm the right of individuals to make their own reproductive choices.

That’s why the League is so deeply concerned about recent proposals that would allow employers and health plans to block contraceptive services and discriminate against women.

By a narrow margin, the U.S. Senate recently defeated an amendment that would limit access to contraception for women if any employer or insurance plan has an undefined “religious or moral objection” to it. This open-ended invitation to cut back on preventative health care services would turn back the clock for women and for American society.

We understand that not everyone agrees with the League on this subject. But we strongly believe that public institutions, including schools and hospitals that receive substantial federal assistance, should not limit the health care choices available to their employees. Institutions that serve the public at large should not impose their own views but should respect the conscientious decisions of each individual.

The League of Women Voters believes that all persons, regardless of gender, should be eligible for preventive health services. Allowing employers to exclude contraceptive services is discrimination based on sex, and it’s wrong.

Today’s top Stories

Mobile Ads Second

Recently Added

Mobile Ads Third

Recent Comments

  • Civic Group Applauds LF Caucus 'Open... (2)
    By Jennifer NeubauerIf the Lake Forest Caucus follows its Bylaws (found at in vetting candidates for Alderman and School Board, if it publicizes the Annual Meeting at which these candidates are slated, and if Lake Forest registered voters show up and vote at the Annual Meeting (Nov. 17, 2015 at Gorton), then the Caucus slate is...
    Read More
  • Civic Group Applauds LF Caucus 'Open... (2)
    By Just ObservingThe best way "reinvigorate participatory democracy in Lake Forest" or any community with a "caucus system" is not to buy into the falsehood that a "caucus system" is good for democracy. 1. The vast majority of these North Shore "caucuses" are not true caucus systems set forth by state statute. 2. They are simply political...
    Read More
  • Older »

Mobile Ads Fourth